Swedish vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Guatemalans

Excellent
Poor
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 394,167,772 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 26.1 Guatemalans.
Swedish Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Swedish vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 30.1%), median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $46,736, a difference of 22.9%), and median family income ($108,499 compared to $88,295, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $51,525, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $35,695, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $54,526, a difference of 15.1%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricSwedishGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
22.6%

Swedish vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 82.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 64.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishGuatemalan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.4%

Swedish vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.6%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishGuatemalan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Swedish vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 24.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.2%

Swedish vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishGuatemalan
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
37.1%

Swedish vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 61.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 14.3%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Swedish vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 146.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.9%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.4%

Swedish vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Swedish vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricSwedishGuatemalan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%