Swiss vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,177,919 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.572. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.135% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 134.9 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,681 compared to $101,681, a difference of 18.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $112,666, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $44,586, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $57,003, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $68,822, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.0%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 13.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.67%), married-couple households (49.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.32%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 50.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%).