Belgian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,477,076 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.129% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to a decrease of 128.7 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,008 compared to $101,681, a difference of 21.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,262 compared to $112,666, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,060 compared to $118,426, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $57,003, a difference of 13.8%), and per capita income ($43,951 compared to $50,057, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.9%), male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 18.0%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.65%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (63.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.2%).