Celtic vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,626,273 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.090% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 89.6 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,193 compared to $101,681, a difference of 22.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $112,666, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $118,426, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $57,003, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $68,822, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.3%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.64%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%).