Samoan vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,140,046 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.227% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to a decrease of 227.5 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $50,057, a difference of 25.7%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $63,827, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,385 compared to $112,666, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $57,003, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $68,822, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.19%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.9%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (67.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 65.6%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.7%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%).