Kiowa vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 2,744,887 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.144% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 144.1 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $118,426, a difference of 58.3%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $101,681, a difference of 54.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,776 compared to $112,666, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $57,003, a difference of 27.4%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $44,586, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 75.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 73.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 72.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 36.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 49.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 61.0%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.28, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households (61.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 78.7%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 70.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.29%), 10th grade (93.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 85.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.0%).