Uruguayan vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,672,575 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 69.4 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 12.9%), median family income ($100,656 compared to $111,306, a difference of 10.6%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $59,359, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $51,898, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $40,923, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($46,190 compared to $49,501, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.67%).