Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,864,184 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 23.6 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 30.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $91,347, a difference of 8.0%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $93,988, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $52,437, a difference of 0.050%), median earnings ($46,190 compared to $45,729, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $40,895, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.6%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 32.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.7%), married-couple households (45.5% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.46%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 118.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 15.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.38%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.17%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.0%).