Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,511,753 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 32.8 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $72,178, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $66,768, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $77,850, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $34,317, a difference of 14.3%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $51,393, a difference of 15.0%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.5%), married-couple households (45.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.1%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (95.1% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.4%).