Uruguayan vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,356,471 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 111.4 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 39.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $85,571, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $51,463, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $51,844, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $40,299, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($46,190 compared to $44,552, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 51.3%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 11.2%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 43.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 37.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple households (45.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 163.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 63.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 26.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.50%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 23.0%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.6%), male disability (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.7%).