Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,107,186 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 125.6 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $77,850, a difference of 30.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $72,178, a difference of 29.6%), and median household income ($86,255 compared to $66,768, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $34,317, a difference of 12.8%), per capita income ($41,678 compared to $35,720, a difference of 16.7%), and median earnings ($45,933 compared to $39,169, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 44.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 42.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 53.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.1%), college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.83%).