Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,809,425 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 22.9 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $46,187, a difference of 15.7%), per capita income ($41,678 compared to $46,008, a difference of 10.4%), and median family income ($101,061 compared to $108,544, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $63,355, a difference of 0.26%), median household income ($86,255 compared to $86,875, a difference of 0.72%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $95,450, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 32.9%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.91%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.9%), currently married (47.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.1%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.1%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.2%).