Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,973,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 64.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $53,359, a difference of 28.0%), median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $65,518, a difference of 22.1%), and median family income ($101,061 compared to $122,764, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $55,932, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $69,774, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.0%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.82%), currently married (47.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.8%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 67.4%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.6%).