Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,872,367 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from Cabo Verde. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to a decrease of 32.4 Immigrants from Cabo Verde.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $46,654, a difference of 35.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $83,542, a difference of 21.1%), and median household income ($86,255 compared to $73,515, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $38,208, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($45,933 compared to $43,963, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $50,520, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 104.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 59.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.32%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.4%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.1%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households (66.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 131.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 111.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 12.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 39.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 71.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 64.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and male disability (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.4%).