Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,197,690 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 81.2 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 49.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $100,322, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $60,666, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,729 compared to $45,710, a difference of 0.040%), householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $50,597, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,748 compared to $93,039, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 53.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.050%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 40.5%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 40.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.6%), married-couple households (41.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.68%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 244.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 82.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 51.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 69.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 79.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%).