Chinese vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,416,765 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 51.8 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,666, a difference of 27.7%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,628, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $100,322, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $54,647, a difference of 4.1%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,233, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,710, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 68.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.0%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.4%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.66%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.8%).