Chinese vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,051,261 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.121% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 121.0 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,217, a difference of 45.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $70,984, a difference of 38.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $83,953, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.1%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $46,611, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $47,366, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 64.5%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 61.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 20.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (49.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.1%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%).