Malaysian vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,659,681 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.951. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.995% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 995.5 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,064 compared to $70,984, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $83,953, a difference of 12.6%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $33,378, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,194 compared to $37,101, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $46,611, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 24.3%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.31%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.050%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.80%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.0%).