Ecuadorian vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,901,593 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 9.3 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $76,903, a difference of 21.9%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $34,578, a difference of 21.3%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $42,581, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.87%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $51,719, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $47,907, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 48.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty (15.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 87.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 76.6%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 53.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.30, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 93.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.3%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 37.3%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 110.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.3%).