Luxembourger vs Menominee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Menominee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Menominee

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Menominee Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,230,053 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 12.3 Menominee.
Luxembourger Integration in Menominee Communities

Luxembourger vs Menominee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $76,903, a difference of 34.6%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $79,563, a difference of 33.5%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $42,581, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $47,907, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $33,894, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $51,719, a difference of 17.9%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$34,578
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$79,563
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$68,423
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$37,884
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$42,581
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$33,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$47,907
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$79,358
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$76,903
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$51,719
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.7%

Luxembourger vs Menominee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 88.3%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 76.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
23.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
25.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
27.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
37.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
17.2%

Luxembourger vs Menominee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 133.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 80.9%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.6%

Luxembourger vs Menominee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 33.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
60.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
33.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
68.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
77.4%

Luxembourger vs Menominee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 88.9%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 73.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (63.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
51.1%

Luxembourger vs Menominee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 119.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.6%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
17.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.0%

Luxembourger vs Menominee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 50.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.9%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
57.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
50.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Luxembourger vs Menominee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 74.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), female disability (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.7%).
Luxembourger vs Menominee Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerMenominee
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
52.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%