Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,862,584 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $42,581, a difference of 43.2%), per capita income ($49,316 compared to $34,578, a difference of 42.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $76,903, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $47,907, a difference of 16.0%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $51,719, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 71.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 59.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 118.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 76.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 111.6%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 85.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 72.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 93.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 57.8%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), female disability (11.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.1%).