Czech vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,083,156 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 14.8 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $83,015, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $70,605, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $87,157, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $52,325, a difference of 8.1%), median earnings ($47,221 compared to $42,189, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $45,338, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 60.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 60.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 25.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.4%), no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 35.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 11.0%).