U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,892,815 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.201% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 200.8 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $103,584, a difference of 25.2%), median family income ($85,294 compared to $106,188, a difference of 24.5%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $87,553, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $52,374, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $40,739, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.0%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.0%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.1%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 29.7%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.22%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 53.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.17%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.2%).