Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,036,780 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $61,976, a difference of 14.7%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $106,188, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $103,584, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $52,374, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $40,739, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $95,698, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.50%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.7%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 138.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 18.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.1%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.92%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.3%).