Thai vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,642,950 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $56,064, a difference of 28.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $95,698, a difference of 27.3%), and median household income ($110,648 compared to $87,553, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $52,374, a difference of 13.0%), householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $61,976, a difference of 16.3%), and median female earnings ($47,577 compared to $40,739, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 46.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 45.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.6%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and single mother poverty (24.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 27.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.41%), family households (67.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households with children (30.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 30.5%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%).