Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,332,559 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $103,584, a difference of 13.4%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $106,188, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $52,374, a difference of 0.49%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $40,739, a difference of 0.54%), and median earnings ($45,820 compared to $48,041, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.0%), receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.5%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 137.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 18.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.4%).