Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,882,405 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 226.6 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $45,043, a difference of 8.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,727 compared to $95,698, a difference of 6.3%), and median male earnings ($59,278 compared to $56,064, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $61,976, a difference of 0.51%), householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $52,374, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $103,584, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.50%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.080%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.59%).