Pima vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,183,932 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,043, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,584, a difference of 41.2%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $87,553, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,739, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,698, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 119.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 103.0%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 102.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 150.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 105.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 68.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 79.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 75.3%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.4%).