Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,980,822 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 62.3 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $95,698, a difference of 12.5%), per capita income ($49,983 compared to $45,043, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $56,064, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $52,374, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $61,976, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.90%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.39%), and family households (64.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.090%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%).