Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,484,192 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.245% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 245.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $103,584, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $95,698, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $87,553, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.0%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $40,739, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $61,976, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 34.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.5%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (59.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.1%).