Immigrants from Barbados vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,826,861 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to a decrease of 40.6 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 39.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $103,584, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,766 compared to $61,976, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,163 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $40,739, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($45,816 compared to $48,041, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 40.5%), receiving food stamps (16.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.7%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 35.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and married-couple households (39.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.75%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 194.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 64.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 27.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 53.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 56.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.2%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.41%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%).