Swedish vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,769,035 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 8.5 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,136 compared to $95,698, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $40,739, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,851 compared to $48,041, a difference of 0.40%), median household income ($88,524 compared to $87,553, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.6%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.47%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.6%), married-couple households (49.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (64.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).