Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,511,916 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 25.6 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $52,374, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $95,698, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,544 compared to $106,188, a difference of 0.34%), median earnings ($48,305 compared to $48,041, a difference of 0.55%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $56,064, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 26.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.93%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.1%), family households (68.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 62.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.6%).