Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,456,072 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 100.8 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $78,045, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $71,801, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $45,529, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $54,512, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $36,017, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $89,285, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 33.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households (63.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.41%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%), bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.0%).