South American Indian vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,607,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.176% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 176.0 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $78,045, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($87,446 compared to $71,801, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $85,207, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.9%), median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $36,017, a difference of 11.1%), and median earnings ($46,952 compared to $41,325, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 22.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.93%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.1%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and family households (64.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.0%), bachelor's degree (39.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.19%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%).