Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,476,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 63.8 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $78,045, a difference of 25.4%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $71,801, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $85,207, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $45,529, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $36,017, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.1%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.8%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.5%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.28%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.6%).