Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,327,200 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.193% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 193.3 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $100,141, a difference of 14.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $85,054, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $101,354, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,186, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $53,237, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.96%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.5%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.2%).