Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,531,439 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Serbia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Serbia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Serbia corresponds to a decrease of 48.9 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,810 compared to $43,464, a difference of 16.9%), median male earnings ($60,600 compared to $53,237, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($51,557 compared to $45,928, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,321 compared to $52,643, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,387 compared to $59,848, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 23.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%).