Immigrants from Kenya vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,410,665 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Kenya communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kenya within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kenya corresponds to an increase of 28.3 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $52,643, a difference of 6.1%), median household income ($83,068 compared to $85,054, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,767 compared to $92,876, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,710 compared to $59,848, a difference of 0.23%), median male earnings ($53,427 compared to $53,237, a difference of 0.36%), and median earnings ($46,214 compared to $45,928, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.59%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.2%), married-couple households (44.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.0%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and college, under 1 year (66.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.40%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.6%).