Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,872,485 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 84.2 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $52,643, a difference of 7.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $92,876, a difference of 4.8%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $85,054, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,852 compared to $43,464, a difference of 0.89%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $39,186, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (67.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (46.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.3%).