Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,471,873 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,759 compared to $43,464, a difference of 32.9%), median male earnings ($69,284 compared to $53,237, a difference of 30.1%), and median family income ($130,894 compared to $101,354, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $52,643, a difference of 6.1%), wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($47,154 compared to $39,186, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 45.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 34.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.0%), births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 69.9%), professional degree (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 67.1%), and master's degree (21.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.31%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.49%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.5%).