Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,685,404 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.387. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.125% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 125.4 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $100,534, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $106,470, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $90,907, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $41,273, a difference of 20.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $62,364, a difference of 21.3%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 50.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.68%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.1%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.17%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.95%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%).