Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,920,748 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 21.0%), per capita income ($41,131 compared to $48,164, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $100,534, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $41,273, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $54,487, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $62,364, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.4%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.0%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.3%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.23%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 54.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.6%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%).