Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Brazil

Average
Good
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,265,932 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 15.9 Immigrants from Brazil.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $48,164, a difference of 10.4%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $90,907, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $100,534, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.96%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $62,364, a difference of 2.9%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $58,324, a difference of 7.5%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Exceptional
$48,164
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Exceptional
$109,418
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$90,907
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Exceptional
$58,324
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$41,273
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$54,487
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Exceptional
$100,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$106,470
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Excellent
$62,364
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.0%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.96%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Good
8.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Average
11.2%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Average
13.4%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.7%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 12.3%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.0%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
29.6%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.2%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.5%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
5.2%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
61.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
50.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Brazil
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%