Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,315,688 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 32.8 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $48,164, a difference of 11.7%), median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $58,324, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $62,364, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $54,487, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $41,273, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.6%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.27%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.91%), and family households (62.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.53%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.1%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.25%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%).