Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,852,289 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 146.6 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $48,164, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $54,487, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $100,534, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $41,273, a difference of 3.8%), and median household income ($94,846 compared to $90,907, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 15.4%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.53%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.2%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.82%).