Alaskan Athabascan vs Houma Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Houma
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Houma
6.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Houma Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,695,743 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,736,486 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Houma |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 34.9% |
| Range | 58.5% | 32.6% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 8.0% |
| Median | 7.0% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Houma by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Senegalese (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Shoshone (6.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Senegal (6.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Congo (6.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.73%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.87%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |