Alaskan Athabascan vs Houma Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
 Houma
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Houma
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Houma Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,798,453 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 25.8%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Houma | 
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.4% | 
| Maximum | 25.0% | 11.9% | 
| Range | 22.1% | 9.5% | 
| Mean | 9.0% | 5.6% | 
| Median | 7.7% | 5.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 2.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Houma by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Crow (4.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |