Chinese vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,898,170 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 23.9 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,608, a difference of 27.8%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,193, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $98,896, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $54,242, a difference of 4.9%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,621, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 57.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.4%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.26%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.49%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.1%).