Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,283,985 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.269% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 1,269.1 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.0%), householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $60,608, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $98,896, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,729 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.010%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,748 compared to $92,241, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($80,373 compared to $83,193, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 44.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 43.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.0%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 37.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.9%), married-couple households (41.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 205.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 72.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 46.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 62.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 61.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.4%).